🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran does not want be seen to be proceeding from a position of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his address to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate answer to address disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the face of this assault."